Skip to content

Best Paragraphs In Sunday Newspaper

September 7, 2008

Sunday newspapers are a treasure trove of political nuggets today, but no one article is better than the verve in Frank Rich’s column.

As The New York Times reported last Tuesday, Palin was sloppily vetted, at best. McCain operatives and some of their press surrogates responded to this revelation by trying to discredit The Times article. After all, The Washington Post had cited McCain aides (including his campaign manager, Rick Davis) last weekend to assure us that Palin had a “full vetting process.” She had been subjected to “an F.B.I. background check,” we were told, and “the McCain camp had reviewed everything it could find on her.”

The Times had it right. The McCain campaign’s claims of a “full vetting process” for Palin were as much a lie as the biographical details they’ve invented for her. There was no F.B.I. background check. The Times found no evidence that a McCain representative spoke to anyone in the State Legislature or business community. Nor did anyone talk to the fired state public safety commissioner at the center of the Palin ethics investigation. No McCain researcher even bothered to consult the relevant back issues of the Wasilla paper. Apparently when McCain said in June that his vice presidential vetting process was basically “a Google,” he wasn’t joking.

###

In other words, McCain’s hasty vetting of Palin was all too reminiscent of his grave dereliction of due diligence on the war. He has been no less hasty in implying that we might somehow ride to the military rescue of Georgia (“Today, we are all Georgians”) or in reaffirming as late as December 2007 that the crumbling anti-democratic regime of Pervez Musharraf deserved “the benefit of the doubt” even as it was enabling the resurgence of the Taliban and Al Qaeda. McCain’s blanket endorsement of Bush administration policy in Pakistan could have consequences for years to come.

“This election is not about issues” so much as the candidates’ images, said the McCain campaign manager, Davis, in one of the season’s most notable pronouncements. Going into the Republican convention, we thought we knew what he meant: the McCain strategy is about tearing down Obama. But last week made clear that the McCain campaign will be equally ruthless about deflecting attention from its own candidate’s deterioration.

What was most striking about McCain’s acceptance speech is that it had almost nothing in common with the strident right-wing convention that preceded it. We were pointedly given a rerun of McCain 2000 — cobbled together from scraps of the old Straight Talk repertory. The ensuing tedium was in all likelihood intentional. It’s in the campaign’s interest that we nod off and assume McCain is unchanged in 2008.

That’s why the Palin choice was brilliant politics — not because it rallied the G.O.P.’s shrinking religious-right base. America loves nothing more than a new celebrity face, and the talking heads marched in lock step last week to proclaim her a star. Palin is a high-energy distraction from the top of the ticket, even if the provenance of her stardom is in itself a reflection of exactly what’s frightening about the top of the ticket.

By hurling charges of sexism and elitism at any easily cowed journalist who raises a question about Palin, McCain operatives are hoping to ensure that whatever happened in Alaska with Sarah Palin stays in Alaska. Given how little vetting McCain himself has received this year — and that only 58 days remain until Nov. 4 — they just might pull it off.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

2 Comments leave one →
  1. notalib permalink
    September 7, 2008 3:13 PM

    And we all know that Frank Rich and the NY Times are a paper of without any kind of agenda. PLEASE stop trying to pass off the NY Times as a honest paper, and PLEASE stop trying to pass off Frank Rich as a reliable source. They both have a far left agenda.

  2. williamu permalink
    September 7, 2008 10:29 AM

    Let’s see if this even gets posted (a test of my liberal friends)…

    Repeating the hysterics of the National Enquirer doesn’t make it so. These baseless charges on Palin haven’t been proven any where. What they do prove is that a) the media is incensed that they didn’t “approve first”, McCain’s pick and b) the liberals are actually not so sure about winning in November.

    Palin being a celebrity? No more or no less than Obama. Perhaps the competition on this account is too much?

    As for your charge of McCain being “vetted” little this year? Most of his life is on public record – what planet are you on?

    So for all the errors, problems, flaws that liberals site with the McCain Palin ticket, you’ve got some serious thinking to do.

    1) Whatever stones you want to throw at them, make sure your ticket doesn’t have the same flaws.

    2) Be careful about how you talk about the rest of the electorate. Make them out to being duped or stupid and “falling for” McCain/Palin shows arrogance.

    Now (at this point) it’s even in the polls. Now the electorate is dialing in. The next 60 days will be a great race. To borrow Paris’ line: I’ll see you at the debate, bitches.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 149 other followers

%d bloggers like this: