Sense Of Desperation Settles Over Nation’s Capitol As Tea Party Terrorists Try To Bring Nation Down
In the past it was the Japanese who attacked the nation, or on 9/11 it was fanatical elements of a bastardized form of Islam that tried to take the nation down. This time the terrorists are from the Tea Party who have used the debt limit debate as a way to gin the nation into a crisis.
This is gritty stuff, and the teabaggers that are taking the nation off the cliff should be treated as terrorists for the shameless blackmailing of the United States government.
For that is exactly what they are trying to do.
They must be defeated just like any other attack on this nation.
This story from the Washington Post tonight paints an image that one does not see everyday in the press. Veteran reporters and wizened politicians have not seen something like this staring down at them before.
Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid announced late Saturday that negotiations with Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and the White House had made enough progress that he would delay consideration of his own legislation to avert the debt crisis.
Rather than a 1 a.m. Sunday vote, Reid said he would give the negotiators room to maneuver and set a 1 p.m. Sunday vote on his bill — which McConnell has already assured would be defeated.
A sense of desperation had settled over the Capitol on Saturday, with the prospect of a government default and rank-and-file lawmakers pleading with their leaders to set politics aside and strike a bipartisan deal to raise the federal debt limit.
After months of negotiation and weeks of debate, every black-and-white plan for cutting government spending and raising the $14.3 trillion debt ceiling seemed either doomed or had already been shot down.
As the battle entered its final tense hours, the nation’s leaders were left bickering among themselves, unable to agree on even a modest version of the plan they said they were on the verge of sealing barely one week ago. The remaining differences between them were not especially large. Still, a resolution appeared elusive.
Unless Congress acts before Tuesday, Treasury officials have said they will begin to run out of cash to pay the nation’s bills. That could force the government into default, an outcome that could devastate the sputtering U.S. recovery and global financial markets. Over the past week, the Dow Jones industrial average fell nearly 540 points amid rising anxiety about the debate in Washington.
To bridge the divide, lawmakers and administration officials were trying to design a mechanism to force the committee to act, giving Republicans their cuts and Obama his debt-limit increase. Many ideas were in play from both parties, and Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) said his staff had drafted three into formal legislation.
But aides said the sticking point remained Republican opposition to a trigger that would force automatic tax increases if the committee failed in its work. Democrats, meanwhile, opposed any trigger that only cut spending, saying that it would not give Republicans sufficient incentive to work with Democrats toward a compromise.
Republican members booed Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), who accused Boehner of going “to the dark side” when he rewrote his debt-limit bill to add required passage of a balanced budget amendment — a change designed to appeal to his far-right wing.
Pelosi turned to look at them, and said it again with emphasis. “Let me repeat, he chose to go to the dark side.”
The atmosphere was just as tense and bitter in the Senate, where McConnell delivered a letter to Reid signed by 43 Republicans declaring their opposition to his version of the debt-limit bill.
Four Republican senators did not sign the letter: Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Scott Brown of Massachusetts. But there was little evidence that Reid’s bill could muster the 60 votes needed to overcome a Republican filibuster — a fact Reid tacitly acknowledged when he rejected McConnell’s offer to stage a vote Saturday evening.




.gif)



















RE: Health care too expensive
Ron, when you think of the alternative, health care is a bargain. And if you think the government isn’t to be trusted to ‘cure’ it for you then you are just as much of the problem as those you say leech off the system. Ron, YOU are the person most responsible for your health care as YOU have direct control of your lifestyle. My guess is you are overweight, probably smoke and ride when you can walk. I am sure you also take advantage of other government programs that perhaps benefit you more directly than government run health care but since you benefit, they are ‘ok.’ Ever travel by air and have a safe flight? Thank the FAA. Our nation’s security? Thank the military. Not get sick off food you buy at the market? Thank the FDA. Enjoy a national park? Thank the Department of the Interior. Don’t visit national parks? Well, then maybe you should grouse about having to pay for that too.
Stop being an ingrate and for God’s sake, stop whining.
I have to agree that I think health care is too expensive, I am just not sure that I trust the Federal Government to cure it for me. Probably no easy answer, and you don’t know until later if you were right or wrong. I just see most government programs as poorly managed themselves.
Few reasons for health care quickly as I post here and eat some lunch.
Skyrocketing health care costs were not brought under control by not doing something and leaving it to the private sector to solve. Uninsured Americans are a cost to the system and also need preventive procedures that could be used to stem long-term costs down the road. Insurance companies need to be held accountable. The practice known as rescission was ended not by the private sector but by government.
Most companies do not want government health care, and the over whelming majority of citizens do not want government run healthcare. First most do not believe it will save money, but rather is another scheme to take from those who have worked and give to those who do not. And secondly, the government has proven time and again to be the worst manager of money in America. There is not one government run sector that is not broke. We give them money for things like Social Security, Medicare, Medicade, etc… they take the money and either give it to some program for which it was not intended, or so some person who did not pay into the program and does not deserve its’ benefits. Please keep them out of my pocket and my healthcare.
I do not share your view that companies are afraid of what government is going to do. That is a political line.
Companies are not using the stockpiles of money they have (thanks to tax cuts) due to the fact the economy does not support more hires or expansions as the economic slow down continues, and seems to be ramping up. I am not sure what businesses you have in mind regarding health care, but you might recall the auto companies, at the end of the Bush years, were talking about how less of a burden they would carry had health care not been a weighty factor on their books for the workers. You probally also know that most credit problems and bankruptcies are the result of medical bills in the U.S. Health care and its solution is a central point to the economic woes, and can not be tossed aside as if it does not matter. I also add that if you want to see shock and awe cut discretionary funding and strangle govt. spending and watch the economy in this most fragile place tumble even further. This last point is one main reason I gagged on the final bill that was passed this week.
Can you name any businesses–besides GE–that have calimed they are sitting on their money and not hiring because government spending is too low? Are consumers waiting for higher deficit spending before they go to Walmart? Obviously not. Companies are afraid of what government is going to do. They see the flood of new regulations from washington in June, the looming Obamacare debacle, and a President who demonizes “corporate jet owners” a few short months after his stimulus bill gave them credits for buying those same jets. Condider the recent comments of Steve Wynn, for example.
Meanwhile, the stock market is down 300 pts. and Drudge reports that debt now exceeds 100% of 2010 GDP. Is that still affordable? Just yesterday, we barrowed 289 billion. Government spending is the problem,
Patrick,
In addition let me add that the Tea Party failed to think about the long-term goals for the nation. I use the very numbers from the GOP to make my point. The House released a report showing an 85%-15% split between spending cuts and tax rises was the historical average for successful fiscal packages. The WH offered an 83%-17% split with no marginla rate increases, and were turned down. And you want me to think the Tea party anything but insane?
Patrick,
I differ with you about the last comment you make regarding what the Tea Party was thinking….if they were thinking as you suggest about the economy of this nation, they never would have throttled back on government spending, as that will only speed the way to lower economic output. Fewer dollars in the system, and more layoffs is not the way to move the economy forward. Talk to those large businesses, such as car dealers in Dane County, and ask about the economy….or the artists that came from around the nation for Art on the Square and for the first time hardly sold anything.
Cutting back on investments and programs is not the answer.