Wisconsin Needs A New Way To Construct Redistricting Maps
There is no reason that Wisconsin continues to grapple every 10 years in the most partisan fashion over redistricting maps. Why such an antiquated system, with the results now before a federal court, continues to seemingly be the only method for creating election boundaries is truly amazing.
If Wisconsin Republicans this session, and had Democratic members last session, taken their respective political heads out of the sand they might have looked around and found a more sane and rational way to deal with census numbers and election boundaries.
In fact, they would have had to look no further than Iowa.
Since 1981, Iowa’s congressional and state legislative maps have been drawn by nonpartisan legislative staffers without considering voter registration numbers or the location of incumbents. Their main considerations are keeping districts compact and uniform in population.
Wow!! What a concept!
What were the results of the efforts of the nonpartisan staffers this redistricting cycle?
The Iowa House approved the new maps on a 90-7 vote, and the Senate weighed in with a vote in favor, 48-1. Gov. Terry Branstad, a Republican I might note, enthusiastically supported the maps. He acknowledged that the new maps allow for a healthy competitiveness between the two parties.
As it should be.
The problem is that too many partisan heads in the Wisconsin Legislature are not able to think beyond their narrow interests, and consider the greater good when it comes to redistricting.




.gif)



















Failure to respect the utilitarian boundaries offered by three, four and five digit postal zip codes can only result in judicial intervention.
It will never happen, nor should it. No matter who draws the lines or places judges, it will be partisan in nature. http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0411/53209.html Especially Iowa.
Barry,
I so agree with the merit selection of judges, and have used this blog as a way to inform and stress the need for such a a change.
Thanks for mentioning it!
Er, that’s adopt and method, above.
Very sensible, those Iowans.
We should also aopt Iowa’s mentod of filling judicial vacancies. No elected judges, only an up or down retention every 6 years of judges who make it past a committee (half lawyers, half lay people), and are appointed by the gov.