Pope Benedict XVI As “Fashionisto” And The Liberace Of The Vatican

The famous red shoes. 

Picture from BBC.

While I am not Catholic, I have long found Vatican intrigue, papal politics, and the history of the popes fascinating.    So when Pope Benedict XVI landed on our shores I saw him as a newsmaker who would speak out on issues that relate to so many in the country.  I watched to see how the media would cover the story, and the type of political reactions his trip would create.

And I was interested in his clothes.  Really. 

The way any pope dresses has just been interesting to me over the years since they have the ability to create the image they wish to convey to those who follow.  And Pope Benedict XVI never misses a chance to dazzle with his attire.  Sort of the Librace of the Vatican.

The New York Times online had a well written column on just what caught my eye this week.

It has long been known in Rome that Pope Benedict XVI is a fashionisto. Not simply for his affinity for highly polished red-leather shoes (John Paul’s were more likely to be scuffed oxblood tie-ups), which were reputed to be Prada (no, say Vaticanologists, they are made by a single cobbler), nor simply for his predilection for (by some reports) Serengeti sunglasses. Rather, it is his use of vestments and other liturgical attire not seen since at least the 1960s that has some Catholics surprised, bemused, befuddled, charmed and, in some quarters, disturbed.

Vestments carry meaning in the church. During the different liturgical seasons priests will change the colors of the chasubles (the large poncho-like garment) that they wear during Mass. During “Ordinary Time,” that is, most of the year, we wear green vestments. During Lent and Advent, purple. During Easter and Christmas, white. On the feast days of martyrs, red. Special meanings are attached to each vestment: the stole, the scarf-like cloth worn under the chasuble, or over an alb, symbolizes authority. Many of these vestments date back to Roman times.

Since the Second Vatican Council, the use of some of the more elaborate vestments (or “vesture”) has been scaled back, if not discontinued, especially under Popes Paul VI and John Paul II. According to some friends in Rome, John Paul sometimes wore whatever vestments were provided for him at the parish, cathedral, or outdoor venue where he was celebrating Mass. He seemed to have simpler sartorial tastes.

Benedict, however, has brought back a number of items of papal clothing not seen for decades, sometimes centuries. In an article for Religion News Service, David Gibson, author of “The Rule of Benedict,” noted the pope has worn “the high mitre of Pius IX, a 19th-century pope known for his dim views of the modern world, and on Ash Wednesday he wore a chasuble modeled on one worn by Paul V, a Borghese pope of the 17th century remembered for censuring Galileo.”

On Good Friday of this year, the pope appeared in the “fiddleback” vestments familiar to Catholics from pre-Vatican II Masses. And around Christmastime he often turns up in a camauro, a red-velvet cap familiar to art history students: no papal portrait in the Renaissance seemed complete without one.

Keith Pecklers, S.J., a Jesuit professor of liturgy at the Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome, noted in an article in The Tablet, a Catholic magazine based in London, that many see a wider agenda at work. “Conservative critics, then, see these changes in papal vesture as indicative of a wider papal liturgical reform under way,” wrote Father Pecklers. “Perhaps they are correct, although the reality appears to be much more enigmatic and complex.”

In general, says Pecklers, these innovations are a reminder that this is a tradition-minded pope. After all, last year the pope relaxed the restrictions on the celebration of the Latin Mass, as a way of reminding Catholics of its centrality in the tradition of the church. (The move angered some Catholics who saw the move as a retrenchment, and even a rejection of the reforms of Vatican II.)

Benedict is also an aesthete, and I mean this in a positive way. He is a highly educated and cultured man who enjoys quoting St. Augustine, loves listening to the opera, and relaxes by playing Mozart on a piano in the papal apartments. So besides indicating his theological views on tradition, his use of ornate vesture may simply represent his personality.

Still, his elaborate garments are not without its critics. “What does that have to do with Jesus?” a friend of mine asked the other night, referring to his mozzetta. “What does it have to do with the poor carpenter from Nazareth?” Hearing someone speak about the need to listen to the “cry of the poor” may be made more difficult when it comes from someone wearing watered silk.

But for Benedict these seem not to be in conflict. The tradition of the church — which includes a call to live simply, care for the poor, and work for justice — also includes the tradition of not only the arts, and of liturgical artistry. The pope embraces these traditions even if it may sometimes make him look outmoded or overly concerned with his appearance.

Finally, when I see him “arrayed in splendor,” to quote Scripture, it makes me think that perhaps Benedict also grasps that many Catholics want their pope to look like the part. It reminds me of something that Brooke Astor, the New York socialite, used to say. When asked why she dressed up for every single event, for example, a meeting at a poor school in Harlem, she said, “People expect to see Mrs. Astor, not some dowdy old lady.”

Many Catholic expect to see the pope, and Benedict, in his finery, does not disappoint.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

 

Published in: on April 19, 2008 at 8:34 am Comments (2)

Pope Gives Support For Millions Of Undocumented Immigrants Living In US. What Would Vicki McKenna Do?

I wonder if the same conservative folks who are upset when drivers license exams are printed in languages other than English, also are upset when the Pope recites the Lords Prayer in Spanish while he visits America? Do English only advocates get angry over such things?  Just wondering. 

That thought crossed my mind tonight as the words from the first full day of Pope Benedict XVI’s trip here were played around the world.  The Pope had led many to think that his trip here would raise the issue of undocumented workers when he visited with President Bush.  He was true to his word and hopefully will continue to address these themes in the days ahead.  The Pope’s political role in the world can be very important.

The German Pope said he would be raising the issue of immigration reform with President Bush and would urge him to push for granting legal status to the illegal immigrants living in the US.

For Carlos Aquino, who heads the Shrine of the Sacred Heart’s Youth Ministries, the Pope’s words were comforting.

“I think his statement was very clear,” said Mr Aquino.

“His comments demonstrate once again that the Church is with the poor, with the immigrants and those who are in need - as well as those 12 million people who are here looking for status or an opportunity.

“I think the Pope is there for them.”

Latinos are likely to make up a large part of the 40,000-strong crowd expected to attend the Pope’s first open air Mass in the US here in Washington, and they will figure heavily when he moves on to New York this weekend.  Would Madison conservative talk radio host Vicki McKenna advocate that the feds target undocumented workers at the open air mass for deportation?

Just wondering.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

 

Will Pope Benedict Ban “Silent Night” While Using Pop Music To Make John Paul II A Saint?

The workings of the Vatican are a constant source of amusement.  If you do not follow Pope Benedict and his actions you miss a great deal.  For instance, the move by the Pope to take the music of the Catholics back to Gregorian chants and baroque music is just the latest entertainment to watch.  For a church that can’t find enough priests or churchgoers, I think the last thing the Vatican might ramp up would be Gregorian chants.  Throw in the Latin Mass, and one has a real reason to run far and fast.

Ah yes, the Pope is on the forefront of thinking by taking the church back to the Baroque period!  Can “Silent Night” make the cut?

BUT WAIT!  THERE IS MORE!

At the same time that this all is in the pipline there is this news item.

A DVD aiming at hastening late Pope John Paul Seconds path to sainthood, which the Vatican is to launch soon, will show the pontiff singing like a music star.

The DVD is titled Santo Subito, a reference to the Latin proclamation “Make him a saint now!”, which was chanted by crowds at the pontiffs funeral in 2005.

British composer Simon Boswell, whose work normally features in Hollywood movies, was employed by the Church to write the music for the DVD.  

As I said, the Pope and the Vatican are a constant source of amusement.  And snickering.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Published in: on November 25, 2007 at 11:02 pm Comments (7)

Wisconsin Book Festival A Madison Favorite

ja.JPG

                           

Wear the old coat and buy the new book.
    ~ Austin Phelps ~ 

( My latest acquisitions while on State Street  Saturday afternoon are pictured above.)

It is hard to believe that the Wisconsin Book Festival is now six years old.  I suspect many of us made a mental note as the month of October approached that the long weekend of books and authors was nearing.   I also suspect that many of us have our insert from the local paper marked with the authors we wish to hear, and the various places where the events are being held.  If you are like me you have also made plans to hook up with friends along the way.  I think carbing up with friends for this event is half the fun!

It seems only yesterday at one of the festivals I sat in Canterbury Books and heard Edmund Morris give a brilliant talk on his book “Theodore Rex”.  ( State Representative Scott Jensen had introduced him that night to an overflow audience.)   It seems that some rabble-rouser in that crowd asked Morris to contrast TR with GW.  After the laughter passed…………

On another occasion Garry Wills who had written “Why I Am A Catholic” answered a very direct question (from that same rabble-rouser) about gay rights and the Church that seemed to unsettle some of the audience.  Wills, being both a class act and an intelligent man answered with clarity, though the Pope might not have agreed.

The topics and ideas during the Book Festival are always lively and diverse.  The choices are akin to a buffet on a cruise ship with the long weekend just the perfect recipe for the hungry mind.  While all events are free it is a good idea to help support this event to insure that it is a longtime event in our community.

As we look forward to the festival we might recall with fondness the bookstores that are not around any more.  Canterbury, which was the perfect coffee and sweet stop while browsing books on State Street, is now just a memory.  While that cozy and warm place is gone, the book festival remains a promising time for book lovers. 

This year the book fest takes place October 10-14, with a theme that seems so appropriate given the times in which we now live.

In honor of the Festival’s theme of “Domestic Tranquility,” speakers at the 2007 Wisconsin Book Festival will explore historical and present-day issues regarding this concept. What begets tranquility? Who decides what is “domestic”? And what role does the government play in protecting it?

From immigration and border disputes, to violence and the right to bear arms, to religion and public life — novelists, poets, journalists, and others will gather to explore what a tranquil home might look like to them.

         My home is where my books are. 
                                            ~ Ellen Thompson ~

While all events are free it is a good idea to help support this event to insure that it is a longtime event in our community.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

$30 Billion AIDS Funding Request Vital

There is a great deal of interest in combating HIV.  Not only is it a medical matter that demands our humanitarian resolve, but it is also an economic matter for many nations that are seeing huge segments of their populations die.  Whole societies in some parts of Africa are changing dramatically in front of our eyes.  While everyone should applaud President Bush for requesting $30 billion to fight this disease, Congress also needs to be mindful that some conservative organization that want to use the funds might have ideas that run counter to the medical needs of the people.

While today there are many conservative religious organizations that are applauding the President for this latest request, we need to be mindful that just last December some faith groups were urging Congress to cut funding for these same programs.  The faith based groups want to use some of these funds to promote religion, while the pragmatic health oriented groups understand the need to promote condom use, and the necessity of drug users having clean needles. 

The Global Fund is the brainchild of Bill and Melinda Gates, and this massive effort is one of the pillars of fighting AIDS around the world.  The only larger program to combat AIDS is President Bush’s 5-year, $15 billion plan from early in his first term.  Together these programs work in 136 countries.  But the united efforts have produced angst with conservatives who wish to use the funds for their own special interests that often run counter to sound medical judgments.

Conservatives were angry that only 6% of funds from The Global Fund were given to faith based organizations.  So some of these groups called late last year for the federal government to end support for these programs.  They basically said that if they could not have public funds to promote the idea of the whole world become an abstinence zone they would take their holy water and go home, urging the Congress to follow them.  That would be incredibly shortsighted. 

The reason being that according to UN reports Christian health associations deliver at least 40 percent of health care in several African countries, including Lesotho, Zimbabwe, Tanzania, Liberia, and Kenya.  No one doubts the good that these groups can contribute when they work in tandem with the medial experts. But if any group seeks to use these funds they must first and foremost have sound medical goals as the driving incentive for their involvement.

The President stepped up to the plate and offered a bold and generous plan.  He decided to show the world that war was not the only thing Americans export during his term, and so made the $30 billion plan public this week.  What Congress now needs to do is craft a very tight bill that will not allow the use of these funds in a way that runs counter to the science and facts of fighting HIV.  The notion that a puritanical approach from faith based groups is an answer to fighting AIDS is remarkably stupid.  Intelligent members of Congress need to deliver a bill that will allow for the best use of these funds as medical evidence directs.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Pope Says Indians Welcomed Enslavement

Every year there is a winner for the biggest whopper of a lie told.  It is only the middle of May,  and yet I feel the contest for this year is over.  Pope Benedict was in rare form when he pronounced on Sunday with a straight face that indigenous people of the Americas had welcomed European priests after they were conquered by the explorers.  That lie/joke may play to uproarious laughter late at night at the Vatican Improv, but it rightfully falls flat in the real world.

When Columbus arrived in the Americas in 1492 the Indians were not ‘purified’ as the Pope would like to spin it.  Unless extermination and purification are interchangeable in the Pope’s lexicon, he just has it all wrong.  The Pope actually blathered on that the people who were invaded actually had a longing for the priests. 

Where does one begin?

The Catholic Church brought three things to the indigenous people.  They were murder, disease, and enslavement.  For the Pope to pretend that history was something else is just plain lunacy.  The lasting effects of the ‘big-hearted’ priests can be seen yet today with the Indians stripped of their rights, and still without traditional lands and culture.  I guess the Pope was too busy re-writing history to speak out and seek redress for these people during his recent trip to Brazil. 

The evangelizing of native peoples has never been the best selling point of the Catholic Church.  For the Pope to try and spin it all as a positive chapter of their past tells us how absolutely out of touch and predatory the Vatican continues to be.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Published in: on May 14, 2007 at 4:34 pm Comments (4)

The Pope As Politician

Vatican political intrigue often makes Washington’s political antics look downright tame.  While most of Washington’s inner workings has a good chance at making page one in a major daily newspaper, the same is not true for the Vatican. There is a mysterious, and at times dark imagery, to the inside workings of the robed ones.  When something newsworthy takes place with the Pope, or the higher operations of the Catholic Church, it is often left to speculation as to what really happened, and why.

Such is the case with the welcomed news that Pope Benedict XVI has endorsed the idea of Turkey being allowed to join the European Union.  At the airport landing in Turkey, the Pope made it known to the Turkish Prime Minister that the Vatican now hoped for the inclusion of Turkey into the Union. It was a major reversal of ideas, since in 2004, while serving as Cardinal, he spoke strongly against the same idea.

I applaud the Pope’s changing of his words, and welcome it as a real gesture towards the finding of common ground with the Islamic world.  His first words in a Muslim country were a far cry from the views he espoused as a Cardinal, and he should be applauded for that action, and his tone.  I also applaud the fact that he thought it wiser to act like a politician, than the leader of the Catholic Church. 

His true inner feelings both as a staunch conservative, and a mentally robust theologian, have not changed.  We all understand that.  But he chose to rise above his own viewpoints and strive for harmony on a larger scale.  That makes him a true politician, and for all my disagreements with him on various issues, I applaud him today.

I think we would all enjoy knowing the inner workings in the corridors of the Vatican that led to this reversal of words.  Was there an agreement that the Pope needed a grand gesture to combat the anger that his previous comments on Islam had unleashed?  How much is symbolism, and how much is true movement towards a united relationship with the Islamic world?

We will not know the answers for a long time, but history proves they will be consequential.
Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Published in: on November 29, 2006 at 4:40 pm Comments (0)

Healing Process Needed With Muslims

If you can believe it, there will be more security to protect the Pope when he travels to Turkey this week, than what was provided for President Bush when he visited that country, according to the Turkish Foreign Minister this weekend.  The need for such high security follows the Pope’s thoughtless remarks made earlier this year about the Islamic faith. 

Pope Benedict XVI will visit Turkey, a mostly Muslim nation, in a bid to repair the divide with the Orthodox Christian Church.  The eastern branch of the Christian Church has had their share of concerns with the Vatican for many centuries, and much interest around the globe with this trip by the Pope has developed over the months. 

While in Turkey the Pope will also try to undo the damage that he created while traveling in Bavaria this year, where he quoted a long forgotten Byzantine emperor who stated prophet Mohammed was evil and inhuman.  Whatever the larger message that Benedict was trying to convey in that speech was lost due to the blunder in making such a statement.  John Kerry and the Pope both share a love for verbal gaffes.

Prior to becoming Pope, then Cardinal Ratzinger mused that Turkey did not belong in the European Union.  His reasoning then, while serving as Foreign Secretary of the Vatican, was that the Turks were not culturally or religiously connected with Europe.  It is little wonder then that the official welcoming delegation for the Pope will be left to the Deputy Minister of Religious Affairs.

It is hoped however that the man with the red Prada loafers can rise above his previous statements and present a forgiving face to the Turks.  The world is in need of unity and grace, and one can only hope that this week the Pope can rise to the occasion.  The religious wars, in word and deed, which have been fought over the ‘one true religion’, have not made our world more godly or just.  I hope that the Pope can truly find the place and time to speak from his heart about his past statements in an effort to start the healing process with the Islamic faith.
Technorati Tags: , , ,

Published in: on November 27, 2006 at 12:55 am Comments (6)

Bishop Morlino Made Me Do It

I do not post links on my blog posts, as I desire this site to reflect an Op/Ed page of a newspaper.  I adhere to my rule 99.9% of the time.  However, the heavy-handed bigotry of Madison Catholic Bishop Morlino concerning the Constitutional marriage amendment demands that I allow a link to a news story.

Madison area Catholics are rightfully upset and angry over the intimidation and threats from Morlino, and are going public with their feelings.  Their actions are justified, and just the tip of the deep felt disgust with the haughty nature of Morlino.

Today, the Madison Capital Times printed a major story on Morlino, and included the fact that this Catholic Bishop who talked so piously about ‘life issues’ in his 14 minute ‘political ad’, also sits on the advisory board of the bloody institution once known as the School Of The Americas. 

As a Catholic friend reminded me, the Madison newspapers have given the Roman Catholic Bishops a wide berth to operate without offering criticism in the past.  The actions by Morlino forced the papers to use ink and report, and the story today is evidence how out of touch the Bishop is with society.

Enough said..read the article.

And thanks to those who protest from the pews!
Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

The Catholic Church And Political Attack Ads

If you live in a state or congressional district with heated midterm races to be decided in one week, you are very much aware that the nasty attack ads are flying all over the television screen.  They are coming from the Republicans by the ton as they try to save their positions of power.  They are coming from the Democrats with righteous indignation over what has happened to America in the past six years.

But not for the first time I wonder who really are those simple-minded citizens who sit there and watch the ads and swallow up the half-truths and smears on candidates from both sides of the aisle?  Why are these voters so poorly informed about the issues and our national debate that they would even consider allowing a self-serving political ad to shape their thinking?  Just how feeble-minded are Americans?  Perhaps I should ask instead just how feeble-minded do both political parties take the voters to be?

If you live in a state (such as Wisconsin) where there is an attempt to place discrimination against gay people into the State Constitution, you are probably aware the Catholic Church is pushing their usual one note theme that all same-sex  sex is wrong unless done in the confessional with an alter boy.  The Catholic Church in southern Wisconsin is so dismayed by all the talk among educated people and the media concerning tolerance and understanding of gay couples, that they are ordering their priests, (both gay and straight) to play a 14 minute speech by Madison Bishop Morlino during services this weekend.  As usual for Catholic religious leaders, Morlino is not dynamic and ranks right up there for excitement with watching your computer ‘de-frag’.   Watching the Bishop on-line tonight I was shocked and embarrassed for him when he trotted out the ‘natural law’ malarkey that enlightened and reasoned people discarded at the end of the 1800’s.  

It got even sadder when he took on the role of medicine man and tried to frighten listeners over stem call research.  It was the earlier Catholic Bishops, much like Morlino, that scorned Galileo for his idea that the earth rotated around the sun.  It took until 1992 for Pope John Paul II to officially concede that the earth was not stationary!  What obtuse relics are in charge of the Catholic Church?

But not for the first time do I wonder who really are these Catholics who still listen to the likes of Morlino and his fellow priests?  Why are some Catholics so poorly informed about science, history, and religion that they would even consider allowing this single voice to dictate how they vote?  What type of feeble and weak-minded parishioners will sit in the pews this weekend and swallow Marlino’s line of crap and not gag? 

Or is it like the politicians and the attack ads?  Does the Catholic Church just take their followers to be fools?  Instead will the Catholic voter reject this illegal type of coercion and use of dogma for crass political motives from their Church?  Is it any wonder the Catholic Church has lost credibility?  And why have we not challenged the Catholic Church over their tax exempt status?

Morlino may think he can cower his weak kneed priests but the blog world says Va’ fa’ un culo!

Religion and Language

Over the past days and weeks the world has witnessed the heightened use of words to inflame the deep divisions over the worlds most populous religion, Islam.  The use of a quotation from a long forgotten emperor in a speech given by the Pope was regrettable, but even he found the inner need to apologize to those he insulted. Meanwhile, President Bush has been using a term as of late for purely political purposes that is meant only to spread fear and inflame passion, all in time for the mid-term elections.

The use of “Islamic fascism’ is one of the most unseemly word choices from this Administration since “Mission Accomplished.”  My readers should note I could find no evidence of Bush ever using the term “Christian fascism” to describe Hitler and his followers during World War II.  To use the term “Islamic fascism” shows the utter contempt he has for Islam, his total lack of understanding the real message and themes of Islam, and his little regard or concern for how our nation is viewed by the rest of the world when such terms are used.

The ones who betray the message of Islam are called al-Qaida and should be called that in speeches.  To try and paint the whole religion with the actions of this element is outlandish.  For an uneducated redneck in a bar it would be bad enough, but for the President of the United States it is absolutely unforgivable.  The term does not aid our fight against terrorism and does not endear us to the moderate elements within the Islamic world that we need in order to build bridges with which to combat our mutual enemy.  That enemy is al-Qaida and not the entire Islamic community.

Bush should recognize that the far majority of those who adhere to the Islamic faith are opposed to the actions of al-Qaida.  The Pope was man enough to understand his error and reach out with an apology.  Meanwhile Bush is a cocky arrogant person who has no ability for inner reflection, and no intellectual ability to know he has wronged not only a whole religion but also, once again, America’s standing in the world.

Published in: on September 20, 2006 at 2:02 pm Comments (1)

Catholic Church Shouldn’t Point Fingers!

CATHOLIC CHURCH IN NEW CRISIS 

 POPE URGED TO SAY “SORRY” 

Know your audience.  Having seen many political speeches over the years I still am surprised how many people do not grasp that simple concept when standing before a crowd.  This week when Pope Benedict XVI spoke he should have known the real audience was worldwide.  That audience encompassed a world audience filled with angst over war, terrorism, and deep religious and political divisions.  Given all that, it was utterly confusing to me why the Pope would include the words of Byzantine emperor (and crusader) Manuel II Paleologue in his speech.  It showed how far the Catholic Church has limped downwards from the time Pope John Paul II went to a mosque and offered a hand.

Pope Benedict XVI quoted from a book a conversation between the emperor and a Persian scholar on the truths of Christianity and Islam. 

“The Emperor comes to speak about the issue of jihad,” Benedict said,  “He said, I quote, ‘Show me just what Mohammad brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith that he preached.’”

The Pope was just plain wrong on the facts.  While Mohammad was alive the Koran doctrine did not impose Islam by force.  It was long after Mohammad’s death that alterations took place in the doctrine of the faith.  (Seems to me the Catholics know plenty about this too.)  If the Pope thought for a bit before speaking he might have reflected on the fact it was difficult to join the faith in the early days of Islam. Christians who wished to do so were routinely turned away.

The Pope then expanded on his topic for his German listeners.

“The emperor goes on to explain in detail the reasons why spreading the faith through violence is something unreasonable. Violence is incompatible with the nature of God and the nature of the soul. “God is not pleased by blood, and not acting reasonably (”syn logo”) is contrary to God’s nature. Faith is born of the soul, not the body. Whoever would lead someone to faith needs the ability to speak well and to reason properly, without violence and threats…. To convince a reasonable soul, one does not need a strong arm, or weapons of any kind, or any other means of threatening a person with death…”

I went on-line to read the full text of his remarks knowing that no matter what else he tried to convey through his words it would never rise above the passages above.

I am left to wonder why he chose to include language from a long forgotten emperor in his text.  At a time when bridge building and dialogue are the very things that demand the worlds attention what was the reason for such foolish statements?  What was the point of bringing 14th century critics of Mohhamned back to life for a day?  If the Pope wished to dig up history, that can be easily done.

Pope Benedict XVI forgot to mention to his German University audience that the term “holy war” was created by one of his predecessors, Pope Urban II.  He also neglected to mention his religion perfected the art of slaughtering  ”unbelievers.”

Since the Pope wants to drag out history he might recall who welcomed the Jews after the Catholic Church turned them out of Spain.  It was the Muslims of the Turkish Ottoman Empire.  He might look to see which major denomination assisted Hitler.  It was the Catholic Church led by Pope Pius XII.

Who was responsible for the blood stained conversions in South America, and the untold tens of thousands who were murdered at the order of Popes during the Crusades?  Again the Catholic Church.

All this brings me back to why this Pope would make a major address and seemingly go out of his way to make a few passages so emotional and ill-tempered that nothing else was talked about from his text.  His ideas about no compulsion in religion and not being forced to a faith might have been more acceptable had he not laced his text with the sharpedeged words.

I end this post where I started.  Know your audience.

Published in: on September 16, 2006 at 8:17 am Comments (6)