Open Letter To Barack Obama

An uncle of mine who cares about our nation, and the tone of our political discourse, wrote a letter to the Barack Obama campaign.  It struck me as one of the best stated short writings on this matter that I had read in some time, and as such post it here for my readers.

Dear Senator Obama,
 
        This is TO AFFIRM my belief in you at a point when so many are attacking and TO BEG you to avoid any Faustian deals to get elected.  Your dreams and integrity have won the support of many Americans.  To lower your standard to expediency would be to sell your soul.
 
        I believe you would not have stayed 20 years at your church if you truly disavow Jeremiah Wright.  I see him quite like the Old Testament prophets (and the Lord himself who quarreled only with the religious establishment).
 
        The longer I live (I’m 70) the more I believe the “average” American Christian is 95% American and 5% Christian–hardly loving God “with all our heart, soul, mind and strength and our neighbor as ourselves”.  I suspect most patriotic Americans would have supported Ceaser in Jesus’ time.
 
        Your commitment to practice justice and care has been blessed.  This stance is unusual in a climate of political expediency.
       
        I want the original Obama to get elected. He is the only one on the horizon who can inspire Americans to work together as George Bush promised in 2000.  I hope, if I have cause to write again, that I can address you as “Mr. President”.  May God bless you and help you keep faith.
 
Sincerely,

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Hillary Clinton’s Win in Pennsylvania Gained By Dirty Tactics At Expense Of Barack Obama

The idea that the Democratic nomination should be Hillary Clinton’s, and that her right to that goal is paramount above the needs of the party and the nation, is hard to understand.  Granted there needs to be within the heart of every candidate the idea that they are the best for the position for which they campaign in order to make it through the daily grind of the race.  That is, I suspect, only a natural feeling.  If a candidate did not feel so strongly that they were superior to the opposition the race should never have been attempted.  But when ego and power becomes the driver of the campaign at the expense of the greater good, than we need to examine that candidate even more closely.  That is where we are this morning after the conclusion of the Pennsylvania Primary where Hillary Clinton defeated Barack Obama 55% to 45%.

The issue is how she won in yesterday’s primary.  By ripping Barack Obama, who many Democrats feel will be the eventual nominee this fall, she only gives ammunition to the Republicans who drove the nation off the road during the past two terms of President Bush’s time in office. 

Despite Clinton’s victory in the state, overall expectations were on Obama’s side. Fifty-five percent said they expected him, not Clinton, to be the party’s eventual nominee.  And Obama supporters were more confident: just 5 percent of his supporters thought Clinton will win the nomination; by contrast, 22 percent of Clinton supporters said they think Obama will be the nominee.

By undermining Obama in such harsh and deep ways, when she knows full well there is no way she can become the nominee, she is feeding the opposition talking points for the fall.  In addition, she is driving a wedge through the Democratic Party that may not be so easy to mend after she has finally been defeated from her seemingly never-ending quest to chase a dream.  Two-thirds of voters in exit polling in Pennsylvania felt that Clinton attacked Obama unfairly.

Bigger needs and issues, from the Iraq War to the recession that grips the nation, should be the topics that are brought home to the dinner tables of the voters.  Instead a steady stream of ‘nasty’ is wrapped in campaign bunting by the Clinton forces and presented as political discourse.  The whole nation suffers by her tactics.

The fact that Barack Obama leads in the national polls, and has more delegates and popular votes, gives no good reason for superdelegates to view Clinton with more enthusiasm now then they did before her six-week trek through the mud of Pennsylvania.  She has taken the Democratic Party on a path no thoughtful or wise party elders wish to travel. 

We are where we were before Pennsylvania.  Barack Obama is ready to be the nominee, and qualified to be President of the United States.

Who will tell Hillary Clinton it is time to exit the stage?

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,

 

Pope Benedict XVI As “Fashionisto” And The Liberace Of The Vatican

The famous red shoes. 

Picture from BBC.

While I am not Catholic, I have long found Vatican intrigue, papal politics, and the history of the popes fascinating.    So when Pope Benedict XVI landed on our shores I saw him as a newsmaker who would speak out on issues that relate to so many in the country.  I watched to see how the media would cover the story, and the type of political reactions his trip would create.

And I was interested in his clothes.  Really. 

The way any pope dresses has just been interesting to me over the years since they have the ability to create the image they wish to convey to those who follow.  And Pope Benedict XVI never misses a chance to dazzle with his attire.  Sort of the Librace of the Vatican.

The New York Times online had a well written column on just what caught my eye this week.

It has long been known in Rome that Pope Benedict XVI is a fashionisto. Not simply for his affinity for highly polished red-leather shoes (John Paul’s were more likely to be scuffed oxblood tie-ups), which were reputed to be Prada (no, say Vaticanologists, they are made by a single cobbler), nor simply for his predilection for (by some reports) Serengeti sunglasses. Rather, it is his use of vestments and other liturgical attire not seen since at least the 1960s that has some Catholics surprised, bemused, befuddled, charmed and, in some quarters, disturbed.

Vestments carry meaning in the church. During the different liturgical seasons priests will change the colors of the chasubles (the large poncho-like garment) that they wear during Mass. During “Ordinary Time,” that is, most of the year, we wear green vestments. During Lent and Advent, purple. During Easter and Christmas, white. On the feast days of martyrs, red. Special meanings are attached to each vestment: the stole, the scarf-like cloth worn under the chasuble, or over an alb, symbolizes authority. Many of these vestments date back to Roman times.

Since the Second Vatican Council, the use of some of the more elaborate vestments (or “vesture”) has been scaled back, if not discontinued, especially under Popes Paul VI and John Paul II. According to some friends in Rome, John Paul sometimes wore whatever vestments were provided for him at the parish, cathedral, or outdoor venue where he was celebrating Mass. He seemed to have simpler sartorial tastes.

Benedict, however, has brought back a number of items of papal clothing not seen for decades, sometimes centuries. In an article for Religion News Service, David Gibson, author of “The Rule of Benedict,” noted the pope has worn “the high mitre of Pius IX, a 19th-century pope known for his dim views of the modern world, and on Ash Wednesday he wore a chasuble modeled on one worn by Paul V, a Borghese pope of the 17th century remembered for censuring Galileo.”

On Good Friday of this year, the pope appeared in the “fiddleback” vestments familiar to Catholics from pre-Vatican II Masses. And around Christmastime he often turns up in a camauro, a red-velvet cap familiar to art history students: no papal portrait in the Renaissance seemed complete without one.

Keith Pecklers, S.J., a Jesuit professor of liturgy at the Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome, noted in an article in The Tablet, a Catholic magazine based in London, that many see a wider agenda at work. “Conservative critics, then, see these changes in papal vesture as indicative of a wider papal liturgical reform under way,” wrote Father Pecklers. “Perhaps they are correct, although the reality appears to be much more enigmatic and complex.”

In general, says Pecklers, these innovations are a reminder that this is a tradition-minded pope. After all, last year the pope relaxed the restrictions on the celebration of the Latin Mass, as a way of reminding Catholics of its centrality in the tradition of the church. (The move angered some Catholics who saw the move as a retrenchment, and even a rejection of the reforms of Vatican II.)

Benedict is also an aesthete, and I mean this in a positive way. He is a highly educated and cultured man who enjoys quoting St. Augustine, loves listening to the opera, and relaxes by playing Mozart on a piano in the papal apartments. So besides indicating his theological views on tradition, his use of ornate vesture may simply represent his personality.

Still, his elaborate garments are not without its critics. “What does that have to do with Jesus?” a friend of mine asked the other night, referring to his mozzetta. “What does it have to do with the poor carpenter from Nazareth?” Hearing someone speak about the need to listen to the “cry of the poor” may be made more difficult when it comes from someone wearing watered silk.

But for Benedict these seem not to be in conflict. The tradition of the church — which includes a call to live simply, care for the poor, and work for justice — also includes the tradition of not only the arts, and of liturgical artistry. The pope embraces these traditions even if it may sometimes make him look outmoded or overly concerned with his appearance.

Finally, when I see him “arrayed in splendor,” to quote Scripture, it makes me think that perhaps Benedict also grasps that many Catholics want their pope to look like the part. It reminds me of something that Brooke Astor, the New York socialite, used to say. When asked why she dressed up for every single event, for example, a meeting at a poor school in Harlem, she said, “People expect to see Mrs. Astor, not some dowdy old lady.”

Many Catholic expect to see the pope, and Benedict, in his finery, does not disappoint.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

 

Published in: on April 19, 2008 at 8:34 am Comments (2)

Pentagon Buys $1.7 Million Of Services From Firms Of Polygamy Bosses Such As Warren Jeffs

Just when the news cannot get any more ridiculous comes word tonight from CNN that the U.S. government paid more than $1.7 million in defense contracts over the last decade to companies owned by leaders of Warren Jeffs’ polygamous sect, with tens of thousands allegedly winding its way back to Jeffs and his church.

As a tax paying citizen I worry often about what the Pentagon is doing with my money.  But I could never have predicted that the very ones who have made the news recently over the abuse of children sexually would have benefited from my (our) tax dollars. 

Some of the deals were made after Jeffs was named to the FBI’s “Most-Wanted List” and remained in place while he was on the run.

CNN has learned that between 1998 and 2007, the United States Air Force and Defense Logistics Agency purchased more than $1.7 million worth of airplane parts from three companies owned by members of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, which practices polygamy.

Those companies are Utah Tool and Die, Western Precision and NewEra Manufacturing. Today, the companies all operate under the name NewEra Manufacturing, a company based in Las Vegas, Nevada, that says it supplies precision components “for the aerospace, military, medical, recreational and other commercial entities.”

“It was my understanding that Western Precision was paying roughly $50,000 a week into the coffers of the church,” former sect member Richard Holm said. “It would have been close to $200,000 a month.”

We have all witnessed this past week the low-lifes in Texas that preyed on children in the name of a twisted religion.  But to hear that our tax dollars benefited these slugs is sickening.

Someone in the Pentagon needs to be held responsible.  And fired.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

 

 

 

Published in: on April 18, 2008 at 8:36 pm Comments (5)

Pope Gives Support For Millions Of Undocumented Immigrants Living In US. What Would Vicki McKenna Do?

I wonder if the same conservative folks who are upset when drivers license exams are printed in languages other than English, also are upset when the Pope recites the Lords Prayer in Spanish while he visits America? Do English only advocates get angry over such things?  Just wondering. 

That thought crossed my mind tonight as the words from the first full day of Pope Benedict XVI’s trip here were played around the world.  The Pope had led many to think that his trip here would raise the issue of undocumented workers when he visited with President Bush.  He was true to his word and hopefully will continue to address these themes in the days ahead.  The Pope’s political role in the world can be very important.

The German Pope said he would be raising the issue of immigration reform with President Bush and would urge him to push for granting legal status to the illegal immigrants living in the US.

For Carlos Aquino, who heads the Shrine of the Sacred Heart’s Youth Ministries, the Pope’s words were comforting.

“I think his statement was very clear,” said Mr Aquino.

“His comments demonstrate once again that the Church is with the poor, with the immigrants and those who are in need - as well as those 12 million people who are here looking for status or an opportunity.

“I think the Pope is there for them.”

Latinos are likely to make up a large part of the 40,000-strong crowd expected to attend the Pope’s first open air Mass in the US here in Washington, and they will figure heavily when he moves on to New York this weekend.  Would Madison conservative talk radio host Vicki McKenna advocate that the feds target undocumented workers at the open air mass for deportation?

Just wondering.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

 

Boycotting The Summer Olympic Games In China

I for one was very pleased to see the protests taking place in Paris, London, and now San Francisco over the human rights abuses and dreadful foreign policy decisions by China.  At a time when too many here think of Iraq and the Middle East when the extremely broad topic of foreign policy is mentioned, it is important that Chinese policies be brought to the center of our global awareness.

I have long argued that the decision by President Nixon to go to China was more important than the Watergate affair.  As deeply damaging as Watergate was to the political culture in our nation, the fact is the positive effects of Nixon’s famous China trip are more important.  The long lasting impact of opening lines of dialogue and trade has benefited both our nations, and fostered connections that will serve all in the future.  If we do what is right.

By having international connections with China does not mean there are not serious differences that will require honest debate and action.  We should not be blind to the fact that every nation that we consider to be a rouge state has the support of China.  China policy to these nations comes in various forms, be it militarily or economic.  Iran is but perhaps the most central example to many who follow the headlines.  But the issues that arise from Chinese policies in places like Tibet and Darfur, and which do not see the banner headlines everyday, are worthy of the reaction that has been seen over the Olympic Games to be held this summer in China.

The ability of leveraging China to move in a more humane direction is one of the benefits of having diplomatic relations with the most populous nation in the world.  We should not, and must not abdicate our role on the world stage.  There is an old saying that “the road to the East runs through the West.”    If the United States uses the clout we now have on the world stage, and in conjunction with our European allies, we can set again a tone and series of expectations about Chinese foreign policy.   There are rules that govern civilized nations, and the world community.

We have the ability to do this, since our primacy on the world stage is not in doubt today.  But with China growing in economic and military power, that chance will not be forever ours to take.  By banding together with leaders such as Prime Minister Brown, and French President Szarkozy we have an opportunity to make a statement about what we think is most important in the world.  As China rises as a world power it does so at a time when open and democratic nations rule the world.  To not coerce China to play by the international rules will set up a world struggle that we will soon regret. 

We have an opportunity with the Olympic Games.  The protestors have opened the door.  Will the United States be willing to lead the world through the door?

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

 

Al Gore: A New Powerful Slideshow About Climate Change

I am not sure how wide spread this video has been distributed, but I feel it is so well done with such a powerful message, that I wanted it here on my site regardless where else it may be posted.  I found Gore’s message so remarkable due to the angle that he takes on climate change.  The ‘democracy crisis’ must be addressed so that the climate changes can be addressed.  A mission of a whole generation is required to do the work to save the planet.  This is worth your time, and I know you will feel rewarded as a result of watching.  I ask that you pass this video around to friends.  Need not be my site….just get the Al Gore video out to the world.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

 

Gov. Spitzer Could Resign Tonight

This is awful news.  And may I say unforgivable. Marriage vows are trashed too often in this country, and it is only made worse when the public trust is damaged along the way.

Lt. Gov. David Paterson Could Be Sworn In By 7 P.M

 CNN reports, and the news is shameful.  I really like Gov. Spitzer and some of his policy decisions, and so this is one of the more difficult posts to publish.

New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer is under investigation for allegedly meeting with a prostitute in a Washington hotel, two sources with knowledge of the investigation tell CNN.

One of the sources said Spitzer is identified in a criminal complaint as “Client-9,” and that Spitzer’s alleged involvement was caught on a federal wiretap.

The criminal complaint involved an alleged high-end prostitution ring run out of New York. Four individuals were charged last week with allegedly running it.

Prosecutors say the ring provided prostitutes costing as much as $3,100 an hour. The criminal complaint did not name any customers, but authorities did intercept text messages, e-mails and telephone calls.

Spitzer on Monday said he “acted in way that violates his obligation to his family,” without elaborating or taking questions.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Published in: on March 10, 2008 at 3:39 pm Comments (1)

I Pity Those Who Steal From A Cemetery

Shortly before Christmas, James and I bought a handsome wreath of dried pinecones anchored on grape vines, accented with red cranberries and apples.  It was a very emotional purchase. My mom had just passed away in August.  After traveling from Madison to Hancock, I added some personal touches of white pine greenery that I cut myself from the woods on my parent’s land.  We had also purchased a wreath stand, but due to the snow and ice cover at that time, found it difficult to place it at the cemetery.  My dad helped fashion a way to make the stand work.  Lots of thought and care went into this simple token of love at Christmas, a way to honor my mom.

As I walked in knee high snow in the cemetery this past Sunday I noticed at once that the wreath was gone.  The stand was still there, anchored as my dad had envisioned, but someone had stolen the wreath from the grave.  I was stunned and sickened even as I dug through the snow hoping that I was wrong.  How could anyone remove something from a cemetery left by a loved one?

I am hurt over this theft, but I feel more sadness for the person who stole it, or perhaps pity.  What would one do with a wreath that was intended for a grave?  My mom would have said that if someone ‘needed’ something so badly they would steal from a cemetery that they could just have it.  My guess is though that the artificial apples on my wreath would hardly feed a hungry family.  What type of person benefits from such an inhumane act?  We will plant a dogwood in her memory at our Madison home this spring, along with white pines from the family woods.  They are only symbols, like the wreath, of what can never be stolen away.  Love.  On the one hand, for as long as we live my mom will always be honored with pretty flowers and wreaths at her grave.  On the other, no one can ever steal away the sad knowledge that this unfortunate thief carries inside, the knowledge that s/he stole from a cemetery.

There are many times when I wonder what is happening to the social fabric of our country. The bonds that united people in a sensible and caring fashion seem to be unraveling.   I tend to think of the social breakdowns as being ‘out there’, and not in our small town communities.  But this past Sunday as I visited my mother’s grave in Hancock I was struck by the fact that even in small towns the points of human connection that we take for granted have become frayed and torn.  I have to wonder where we are headed as a nation.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,
 

Published in: on February 26, 2008 at 12:11 pm Comments (1)

Public Editor Writes Must Read New York Times/John McCain Paragraphs In Sunday Newspaper

To be fair and even-handed on this blog over what was one of the major domestic stories this week, I offer the following as the must read paragraphs in today’s Sunday newspaper.  The public editor (the reader’s representative) has a perspective that is not an island of thought in the country, and as I find the media storm that blew open this week interesting, and have been fascinated with the national dialogue over this matter, I offer the following from Clark Hoyt.  I do not agree with his final assessment, but find his argument well presented, and therefore print this portion.

The pity of it is that, without the sex, The Times was on to a good story. McCain, who was reprimanded by the Senate Ethics Committee in 1991 for exercising “poor judgment” by intervening with federal regulators on behalf of a corrupt savings and loan executive, recast himself as a crusader against special interests and the corrupting influence of money in politics. Yet he has continued to maintain complex relationships with lobbyists like Iseman, at whose request he wrote to the Federal Communications Commission to urge a speed-up on a decision affecting one of her clients.

Much of that story has been reported over the years, but it was still worth pulling together to help voters in 2008 better understand the John McCain who might be their next president.

I asked Jill Abramson, the managing editor for news, if The Times could have done the story and left out the allegation about an affair. “That would not have reflected the essential truth of why the aides were alarmed,” she said.

But what the aides believed might not have been the real truth. And if you cannot provide readers with some independent evidence, I think it is wrong to report the suppositions or concerns of anonymous aides about whether the boss is getting into the wrong bed.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Make Your New Federal Tax Rebate Work Locally In Madison

hands.jpg

I received this from a friend who is working to construct a local avenue for affecting change right in front of our faces.  If you are interested I will forward any feedback here (email addresses) to Carol Bracewell of Madison, who has thought out this idea for making our community a better place to live.

Hey friends,
I’ve had this idea for a week now and want to test it out.
It looks like many of us may be getting several hundred bucks from
this “economic stimulus” plan of George W Bush. I personally think
that our schools and local social programs could use the money to
help people in more creative ways than handing out cash.
So I was thinking of setting up a pass-through account at Madison
Community Foundation and encouraging people to donate their
“stimulus” checks into the account. If we get 10 people to give $500,
that would pretty much cover a year at MATC for a young person to be
trained for a good job, or for a returning adult who needs retraining
after his/her job got sent overseas.

I have other ideas for how to have grassroots input on where the
donations could go… like via a web site with a Community Forum. If
many people are interested, we could identify multiple areas to
donate, like renewable energy, education, housing, healthcare, etc,
making sure all the money stays local and really supports long-term
opportunity, not short term commercial spending.

In my wild dreams, this would catch on and a lot of people would see
it as a great alternative. I emailed some more creative minds to see
if they could come up with a catchy phrase and/or promo campaign.
Until then, though, I’d like to put the idea out there. I’m sure each
of us could think of many great ways to donate the money, and at the
same time, if we aggregate it in one place, it might make an even
bigger difference for someone who needs it.

So if you think this is an interesting idea you could support and
share with your friends, let me know. It will cost $1000 to set up
the account. I’d be willing to front that once the Government makes
it a little clearer who would be getting how much and when.

Thanks, and please pass it along and encourage people to write me
back. Good ideas for a name are welcome to. “Pay if Forward” is
taken, but that’s the general idea.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Published in: on February 23, 2008 at 2:19 pm Comments (0)

My Reaction Over John McCain’s NYT’s Story

As a long time reader of the New York Times (since Aug. 1982) I know that printing sexual innuendo is not something the ’paper of record’ has ever done.  They just are not that type of news operation.  Never have been, never will be.  So I am certain that the story that has provoked many is based on solid reporting.  In other words that means this story concerning Republican presidential candidate John McCain and a young attractive lobbyist has some teeth.  I am very confident that there is factual foundation that resulted in much digging and sourcing that allowed for the story to be printed and placed on page one on my morning paper.  This story was not written overnight and much thought went into this matter before publication.  There is no way in the world that the NYT’s would sully their reputation for a fabricated or loosely sourced story.  NONE….and that is why some are so nervous today.

Second, there is a never-ending attempt to define the New York Times as a liberal newspaper.  That is wrong.  My readers might recall that it was this paper that first broke the Whitewater scandal regarding the Clinton’s, and was in many minds ‘buying into’ the rationale for going to war in Iraq.  Hardly the liberal newspaper that many hope to portray it to be.   The fact is that too many readers do not understand the separation between the news reporting aspect to a newspaper, and the responsibility of the editorial board of the paper.  That confusion has often led to gross mislabeling of the New York Times.  In the end the newspaper is a daily review of the whole world with objectivity and journalistic professionalism.

Third, I strongly urge everyone to follow the news on this story.  I guess that will be mighty easy to do.  This is a huge one, and will be impossible not to notice.  I suspect that this is not the end of the new facts to be uncovered concerning this matter.  I am not pleased with this, as I like John McCain.  I think my past posts on his candidacy reflect that fact.  But a news reporter must follow the story regardless where it leads.  And as more facts come to light the way the New York Times wrote and broke the story will also be better defined.  Understanding HOW the story was reported will be insightful for many who do not understand the news business, and who wish to paint every action in a political color when it comes to the New York Times.

I know in the end the highly professional and competent manner that is the standard of the New York Times will still stand.

Technorati Tags: , , ,