Should People Pay To Watch TV On Demand?

This issue is one I find geekishly intriguing.   As one who loves Hulu, but also appreciates the need for ad revenues to be generated somewhere along the way for business to operate…………

How people watch TV on demand — and whether they should pay for the privilege — is a critical issue in the landmark deal, announced Thursday, that will give Comcast control of NBC Universal. In the deal, Comcast will become a co-owner of Hulu.

Like all its broadcast rivals, NBC rushed to put its popular shows on the Web years ago, hoping to secure a piece of the booming online advertising market and offset an eroding audience.

The viewers came in droves, but the ad revenues have not materialized as expected. By giving away TV episodes online, “the industry is literally tossing money and premium content away,” Barry M. Meyer, the Warner Brothers Entertainment chief executive, said in a speech in October.

Comcast, the country’s largest cable operator, has already been using its considerable muscle to limit how many shows are available online, lest people think they can cancel their costly cable subscriptions and watch free online. Now the company — which, if the NBC deal passes government muster, will own a piece of the biggest site that threatens to undercut its core business — is looking for ways to charge for ubiquitous access to shows.

With millions now watching TV on their computers, can the media companies put the Hulu genie back in the bottle?

2 thoughts on “Should People Pay To Watch TV On Demand?

  1. Whether we should or shouldn’t pay, I’m afraid that with Comcast taking over we will probably have to pay sometime in the near future. It’s kinda sad that with all the break through in communication that has been made in the past 20 years that the cable bills are just going up in price. The average cable bill if you have internet and a standard package is pretty damn ridiculous. Many people I know have gotten rid of their cable all together due to the price, and that they are at home less due to work. No one’s gonna complain loud enough though. People will just accept it and pay for it. It’s like how there’s commercials at the movies now. We pay to see the movie damn it, not the fracken new Coca Cola or GM Commercial. It now costs $1.99 for most songs on iTunes now. These companies don’t care about the spread of free entertainment or information, all they care about is the dollar. They know people will pay regardless because most people don’t care, but they should. Inflation’s another topic.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s