More and more news reports are painting a picture of the person responsible for the slaughter of at least 92 Norwegians on Friday.
As stunned Norwegians grappled with the deadliest attack in the country since World War II, a portrait began to emerge of the main suspect in the case as a gun-loving Norwegian obsessed with what he saw as the threat of multiculturalism and Muslim immigration.
The police have not identified the suspect, but Norwegian media have identified him as Anders Behring Breivik, 32.
In a Facebook page and a Twitter account set up under that name days before the rampage, suggesting a conscious effort to construct a public persona, he cited philosophers from Kant to Machiavelli. Though there did not appear to be calls for violence in his Internet postings, he hinted at his will to act in his lone Twitter post, paraphrasing John Stuart Mill: “One person with a belief is equal to the force of 100,000 who have only interests.”
The prime minister, Jens Stoltenberg, who also met with survivors on Saturday, would not speculate on a motive for the attacks.
“Compared to other countries I wouldn’t say we have a big problem with right-wing extremists in Norway,” Mr. Stoltenberg told reporters at a news conference. “But we have had some groups, we have followed them before, and our police is aware that there are some right-wing groups.”
Mr. Breivik had been known as polite and conscientious man by former colleagues. But his writings on a right-wing Web site, Document.no, revealed another side, an abiding obsession with Marxists, Muslims and Norway’s multicultural ideals.
Though he does not call for violence in the postings, he denounces the demographic change that he says has undermined Christian communities in places like Kosovo and Lebanon. Mr. Breivik writes: “Can you name ONE country where multiculturalism is successful where Islam is involved? The only historical example is the society without a welfare state with only non-Muslim minorities (U.S.).”
CAFFEINATED POLITICS 
Could someone please tell me somewhere on his Facebook page, in his ramblings or on a scrap of toilet paper evidence where a bible verse is scawled, or where he says Jesus is Lord anything??
So, one has to ask is this nut a “Christian Terrorist” who espoused the teachings of Jesus when he carried out the attack or a Terrorist who happened to go to church once in a great while?
To the left he is a Christian Terrorist and that is game, set and match in Progressive World.