Skip to content

More Fees For Wisconsin Vehicle Owners A Smart, Needed Proposal

January 24, 2013

Over the past election cycle I was one of the continuing voices to underscore the need for more revenue to run our government.  There is no doubt that more revenue is required for the programs and services that impact the people who use and benefit from them.  While Republicans continually stated they only wanted to cut and purge spending, many Democrats were talking about the need for more revenue.

It has long been a sore point with me that too many think taxes should only always go down, and additional revenues are never to be found or increased to maintain our services which allow our society to function.   While there is always room to debate the merits of a tax increase versus a fee increase I am still pleased with the direction a state transportation commission has taken, one that is making bold headlines today.

The commission is asking lawmakers and Gov. Scott Walker to adopt a 5-cent hike  in the state gas tax, an increase in annual vehicle registration fees based on  miles driven, and a big jump in heavy truck registration fees.

The need to raise revenue for Wisconsin’s transportation needs should not be controversial.  We might debate the way to raise the funds but there is no doubt that without increased amounts of money, or new ways to fund our systems the state’s infrastructure will falter, and our economy will be placed in a further long-term pinch.

The harsh ideological wing of the Republican Party will have to bend and compromise to allow for the fees to be placed into the budget, and then show some spine and cast a vote for passage.  But at the end of the day it should not be a rough vote to take.  If common sense and the facts of our transportation needs are front-and-center then the political way forward will be easy. I say this as I know good policy is also good politics.

No credible elected official can truly think that revenue sources should not be found or increased to make our state roads continue to be a source of competitive commerce.  No licensed driver can believe they do not have a stake in maintaining the roads they use, or insuring new ones are built to support the added growth we will needed as the economy expands.

No one else may say it today, but I will.

I think it took guts and forethought for the Transportation Finance and Policy Commission to make the recommendations it did.  It is easy to skirt an issue, or propose only ideas that meet everyone’s desire.  But to squarely define the problems the state confronts with our transportation needs, and then find a route forward should be applauded.

We should all desire more men and women in Washington such as those who made up this bi-partisan commission in Wisconsin.  This group worked to find solutions for our revenue shortfalls, and did not fall short of their mission due to some political taboos.  They seem to understand that government is best when it works and functions for the people.

Governor Walker and other Republicans often throw a political barb at Washington for the lack of getting ‘anything done’.  Now might be the time for the GOP in this state to demonstrate for others that they know how to fund the highways, harbors, airports, and bicycle transportation projects the people use and want.

4 Comments leave one →
  1. Michael permalink
    June 11, 2017 8:48 PM

    You are absolutely correct. We need to admit as a state and nation that additional fees and taxes are essential if we are to have the social aspects that allow us to function properly.

  2. January 25, 2013 6:53 AM

    Hmmm, I always wonder about the traceability of taxes. Can we actually trace the origin of money spent back to the tax or fee imposed? Like food or gun traceability, shouldn’t we know which taxes actually pay for which benefits? I’d like to know more about that process…

  3. January 24, 2013 2:52 PM

    I am open to hearing how anyone wishes to pay for the transportation services we use everyday. As things exist at this time how are to pay for maintaining and expanding transporation needs?

  4. Solly permalink
    January 24, 2013 2:31 PM

    Guess we can start calling you “Concrete Deke.” This tax is okay with Republicans, because it’s a take from the many to give to the few (the roadbuilders, who, coincidentally are big contributors to the Republicans – let the circle, be unbroken, bye and bye lord bye and bye). Lord, I don’t want to be in that number.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: