Facts Show Ben Carson Wrong About Other Candidates Not Being Scrutinized
Of course Ben Carson is wrong to claim that no other presidential candidates have not had to deal with the type of scrutiny that he is now receiving.
Despite Ben Carson’s ridiculous claims that is somehow being treated differently in this campaign than other candidates have in the past is totally absurd. First Read finds it’s just not true. (As if we even needed to put this in print–anyone who follows politics knows Carson is wrong.)
Carson might come to understand that when the only thing—the ONLY thing–that makes for his political resume is a biography means that personal story has to be accurate and honest. Carson is not telling the truth about his past and reporters have caught him.
So for Carson to claim he is being picked on…….barf!
“We found a combined 165 New York Times and Washington Post articles that were all (or partially) about Barack Obama and Jeremiah Wright between the time Obama first launched his presidential bid (Feb. 2007) and his 2008 victory (Nov. 2008). During that same time period, we found an additional 41 New York Times and Washington Post pieces on Obama and Bill Ayers. And from the start of her campaign (April 2015) until now, we discovered a combined 44 NYT/WaPo articles about Hillary Clinton and her email server.”
“Bottom line: When you’re atop of the presidential polls, you’re going to get scrutiny — lots of it.”