Once again, there is a news story about Michael Gableman threatening jail time for a mayor from one of Wisconsin’s larger cities. The reason for such bluster is because, once again, no one is agreeing to sit for what can only be termed as a secret interview.
I recall warmly the affable and jowly former Senator Sam Ervin who knew full-well the power of public questioning of individuals involved in the crimes of Watergate. The televised hearings of the Senate Select Committee were a powerful tool that allowed the nation insight into the workings and shady dealing of Richard Nixon’s White House and campaign committee for his reelection.
The House Select Committee relating to the insurrection and rioting at our nation’s Capitol on January 6th also understands the power and need for public hearings. They plan to schedule some prime-time hearings this spring so the nation can better follow along with their work.
It comes as no surprise from a political, public relations, and sound governing perspective open and public hearings are logical.
It is highly troubling and unfathomable to explain, then, how a former justice of the Wisconsin Supreme Court is attempting to hold closed, secret, and behind-the-door questioning of duly elected mayors from our state’s largest cities. Openness and transparency is not a new concept. Questions arise and suspicions deepen when people with power seek to limit light and forthrightness.
Why would Gableman go out of his way to create confusion and mystery? Why would he not want to showcase ‘election chicanery’ with a full array of reporters to record his findings?
Perhaps Gableman does not wish to be akin to Geraldo Rivera who opened an empty vault on national television. But therein lies the danger to our democracy in that grand allegations can be made undermining the faith of our election process, but then not the same volume and bandwidth being provided to prove such claims to be wrong.
It is incumbent upon those who thought it wise to set up such a ludicrous investigation probe and place Gableman in charge, to now step up and demand that any hearings or questioning be done in public. The fact is, of course, that no foundation exists for questions about the credibility of the election process, or the outcome by the voters. We know that any public questioning will only further underscore the abuse of power by Speaker Robin Vos and further shine a light on the laughable spectacle that is Gableman.
I must say, that over the past months when Gableman puts out his press releases or speaks I am continually reminded of John Alexander who plays the role of ‘Teddy Roosevelt’ in Arsenic And Old Lace. That delusional character was supposedly digging the Panama Canal in the basement.
Gableman makes as much sense in trying to prove election chicanery the size of the Panama Canal in the 2020 elections.
We see on both the international stage and the more local one the absolute necessity of being vigilant about democracy. The fabrication of why Russian forces ‘needed’ to invade a sovereign nation is repugnant. But so is the creation of a Big Lie about the presidential election that now ‘requires’ closed-door questioning by Gableman.
What is so disconcerting about this entire story is that, first and foremost, the investigation was predicated on a conspiracy theory without any factual foundation. To continue fostering lies about the 2020 election, and to use duly elected mayors as part of the orchestration of that conspiracy so to play to the base of the Republican Party is a complete travesty.
At some point, this bizarre episode by Gableman will end. But when the credits roll, unlike when they did with Alexander’s movie performance, we will not be left with a fond memory.
There was no Panama Canal on that Hollywood movie set, just as there was no election underhandedness that merited this investigation. The only lasting impact of this affair will be the undermining of faith citizens must have in our electoral system.
And so it goes.